Action - 60% would be awesome ! I appreciate the fact that you limit your plays to only your strongest opinions. I'd rather not see any plays from you all week and then have one pop up and win instead of weeding through lots of picks with different ratings. Best of luck - Nick
BTW - DO you not do totals ? I don't recall any in your football posts.
BTW - DO you not do totals ? I don't recall any in your football posts.
Okay, this pick is going down in flames and I have an honest question.
First of all, I have to admit that college Basketball is not my strong sport...so when I see a capper like you tout this selection in such a strong manner...I follow your advice. My question is WHAT made you select Davidson? I'm watching this game and can't see a single thing that Davidson could do to stay ANYWHERE close to Texas Tech...in fact, they really suck. So, please let me know what went wrong.
Thanks
First of all, I have to admit that college Basketball is not my strong sport...so when I see a capper like you tout this selection in such a strong manner...I follow your advice. My question is WHAT made you select Davidson? I'm watching this game and can't see a single thing that Davidson could do to stay ANYWHERE close to Texas Tech...in fact, they really suck. So, please let me know what went wrong.
Thanks
Quit bitching. if you needed an explanation why to play it you probably shouldn't have played it. Why didn't you ask what his reasoning was before the play lost. wouldn't have mattered if it won i guess. i have seen actions analysis on games and it is top notch. His knowledge of sports and wagering far exceeds LSU is awesome like yours. Except the loss and play him or fade him just don't bitch about it later and ask for explanations
Lockline, I'll bitch if I want...asshole! And I will certainly ask for an explanation.
In this case I wasn't bitching, I sincerely want to know what encouraged Action to make the selection. The pick lost by a margin that was DOUBLE the spread, which means something in the analysis was off. OF COURSE I wouldn't ask the question if it had won....because there wouldn't have been an indication that something was wrong.
In this case I wasn't bitching, I sincerely want to know what encouraged Action to make the selection. The pick lost by a margin that was DOUBLE the spread, which means something in the analysis was off. OF COURSE I wouldn't ask the question if it had won....because there wouldn't have been an indication that something was wrong.
LSU Pete,
Without alot of mumbo jumbo, Davidson (per preseason publications) is supposed to be atop the Southern conference. Texas Tech predicted 6th to 8th in many publications in the Big 12.
Let's face the fact that Davidson shot horrendous from three point range (which is usually their strongsuit). I am not perfect, and don't protest to be. I hope next time that we can collect the money. I promise you I work diligently on My TRIPLE plays. But, unfortunately, they don't always win..
Good Luck As Always
Action
Without alot of mumbo jumbo, Davidson (per preseason publications) is supposed to be atop the Southern conference. Texas Tech predicted 6th to 8th in many publications in the Big 12.
Let's face the fact that Davidson shot horrendous from three point range (which is usually their strongsuit). I am not perfect, and don't protest to be. I hope next time that we can collect the money. I promise you I work diligently on My TRIPLE plays. But, unfortunately, they don't always win..
Good Luck As Always
Action
Whatever..... if the game won you would not have cared what the analysis was and why he picked them. No need to get in action's face about one game. I'm sure when you lose a game that you post... for free... for everyone to see... you want to go over all the reasons it lost. I'm not picking on you but your tone wasn't needed.
